US Vote Smart

Home » 2024-11-05 election » At-Large » MCHD Board At-Large Position 3 » Georgette Whatley

Georgette Whatley
Party Republican
Website
Born 10/02/1958
Education Degree in Accounting cum laude
Occupation Bail Bond Surety
Religion Christian
Marital Divorced
Children 2

Georgette Whatley

declared

Ms. Whatley has served on the MCHD Board of Directors since 2004, including a term as Chairman. She is the owner of a small business located in Conroe.

Georgette earned an Accounting Degree from Sam Houston State University, where she graduated Cum Laude in 1985.
After working for Mitchell Energy for a number of years, she earned her teaching certification and taught elementary school for 15 years. After her teaching career, she decided to become a small business owner and real estate investor in 2000.

She lives in April Sound, and has been a resident of Montgomery County since she was in high school. Georgette is proud of her two children, Stephanie and Geoffrey, who both currently attend Texas State University in San Marcos.

MCTP Score of: 65 Source

Submitted by john wertz on 2024-09-28 22:03:33

 

Pros

  • 20 years experience in the MCHD. Knowledgeable about certain aspect of the job
  • Friendly and engaging

Cons

  • During our interview with Ms. Whatley, when asked about how many employees, ambulances and other stats she should know, but she indicated those were "micromanagement issues" and didn't get involved.
  • She and fellow board member and Chairman Brent Thor appointed not only a democrat to the board but also one who has a prostitution and theft record
  • With Chairman Thor, has recently voted for the higher Voter-Approval Tax Rate(except 2025) and has reportedly voted for that over the taxpayer-friendly No-New-Revenue Tax rate, which would have kept taxes the same.

Video Interview Source

Submitted by john wertz on 2024-09-28 22:02:10

 

Questionnaire

General

Why are you running for this office and what 3 major goals do you want to be measured by if you are elected?

I have lived in Montgomery County since I was a child and learned from my parents, by their example, that I have a responsibility to contribute to my community.  Even though I contribute to our county in many other ways, MCHD is most near and dear to my heart.  I’ve been a member of the MCHD Board for 20 years.  We’ve lowered the tax rate every year since I’ve been on the board and added multiple tax exemptions to make the tax burden as minimal as possible while still providing 1st class services to our citizens. WE are THE lowest taxing entity in the county and have been for many years.  Volunteering is very rewarding, and I would like to continue serving my neighbors. I’m proud of what we’ve accomplished in the last 20 years and want to be a part of continued progress.

Goals:

Our reason for existing is to provide financial assistance for medical treatment for our indigent population.  We’ve come a long way by re-establishing damaged relationships with hospitals and creating a network of providers, including specialty care for our clients.  Programs have been implemented to reduce unnecessary trips to the ER. Our paramedicine team visits some of our clients to make sure they have the appropriate medication and are taking it as prescribed, so they don’t have to call 911.  Our staff has worked hard to establish relationships to get discounts on prescriptions for our clients, thus saving taxpayer dollars. Additionally, an outreach program has been established to assist our indigent population in finding out about available services and helping them get through the application process.   I want to continue to support our staff as they continue to make things better for our indigent neighbors.

It’s important to continue to support our EMS department so they can continue to serve all of our neighbors.  Our EMS is the best in the state, bar none! When you call 911 for an ambulance, a miniature ICU unit shows up at your door with highly trained professionals. We are recognized nationally and have accreditations few others have earned.  Our crews have saved many lives because they have the training and equipment they need.  I want to make sure they continue to have what they need.

Last, but certainly not least, we have an obligation to the taxpayers to keep our tax rates as low as possible while providing stellar service to our community in all that we do.  I will continue to keep my eyes on the spending while being mindful that some things are vital to the community, even though some are expensive.  Our most valuable resource is our employees.  I want to make sure they are taken care of.

 

 

 

 

Do you have any experience with EMS or medicine?

I don’t have EMS or medical experience but it’s not a requirement for a position on the MCHD board.  Our role is to set policy, set the tax rate, and approve the budget.  I have a degree in accounting with a 3.7 overall GPA and a 4.0 GPA in all my accounting classes, which is a benefit in reviewing budgets and setting tax rates.  

Should Disrtict employees take home District vehicles and if so for what purpose?

Employees who are on call to handle emergency situations outside of their normal working hours, and our CEO take home vehicles. 

Should the Medical Director answer to the Board?

It would be appropriate for the Medical Director to report to the board, in much the same way the other executive team members do.  The question asks if he or she should “answer to” us.  Board members are not required to have medical training of any kind so it would be difficult to assess performance or determine if he or she was following proper protocols or procedures.  The Medical Director answers to the CEO who has the knowledge and experience to evaluate the services provided.

Is it the responsibility of the Board to monitor the spending of the District and verify expenses?

Absolutely.  We review proposed spending during the budget cycle.  We also look  at the expenses prior to the board meeting and ask questions before or during the meeting if anything seems out of line.

Typically, the CFO catches any questionable spending and addresses it before it ever reaches the board.

Additionally, disbursements over $50,000 require a board member’s signature.    I have been the primary board member who has approved (or rejected) those disbursements for at least the last 12 - 15 years.  I review the documentation submitted with the request before I approve it.  Typically, the requests were discussed and approved by the full board at a recent meeting, as well as being budgeted expenses except in a few cases.  Not all board members qualify to be approved by the bank to approve disbursements based on their financial history.

Should Board members have complete access to all areas of the District?  Why or why not?

A board member should be able to access all areas of the District, within reason.  Our employees have a job to do and unexpected interruptions by a board member, or anyone else, could potentially cause an issue. Discretion must be used to avoid violations of personal confidentiality rights, personal space, or HIPAA violations.  It would not be appropriate to access any area without prior notice to the Supervisor and employees in that area.  For example, a board member should not be visiting an ambulance station at 10 p.m. at night especially if the board member is a male and the crew members are female.  That’s their time to sleep.  A board member should not be allowed to walk into our HCAP office unannounced when an employee might be discussing medical records with one of our clients.  HR is off limits, too, during a conference with, or discussion about, an employee.  I don’t believe anyone has ever been denied access to any area.  Access should be allowed; however, it should be scheduled in advance.

Should Health Care Assistance Patients be required to have drug testing in order to receive assistance?

It would be ideal if every person receiving government assistance of any kind had to pass a drug test to receive assistance.  Unfortunately, I don’t believe there’s currently a law stating that.  Perhaps our Legislators in Austin can address that during the next session.

Do you believe Board members should be allowed to ride along with EMS crews and spend time with Alarm and other departments?

Board members should be allowed to ride along with an EMS crew, tour alarm and other departments to see what our employees do.  However, MCHD has had to implement some rules because one or two of our former board members overstepped their authority, getting actively involved in the situation, interfering with the crew on a call, telling the police and the Emergency Department at hospitals they were the employees’ boss, which they were not. The Board should not micromanage the district employees, so these visits should be few and far between and limited in duration, and definitely limited in interaction with the employees.  Board members should only observe, not participate. 

The Board is to set Policy, should it have any say in procedures?

Policies are the guiding principles to establish procedures.  Getting involved in establishing procedures when we’re not familiar with the day-to-day specifics would be micro-managing.  That’s the responsibility of the Management and Executive personnel.  Board members have access to the procedures and certainly can discuss their concerns at a board meeting.  I recall such a discussion a few years ago regarding “sole source” vendors.  As a result, the procedure was updated to keep the board better informed when a sole source vendor was proposed.

Budget

Should Board members attend the MCHD Budget workshops and hearings?

Attending the Budget workshops is available to the board members, but optional.  It might be worthwhile for new board members to attend, but it shouldn’t be mandatory.  It’s a 2-day event and not everyone can take off work to attend.   We receive the proposed budget well in advance of the approval date and have ample opportunity to review the budget and ask questions.  Very few board members attend because we have all the information we need as well as the opportunity to ask questions via e-mail, phone call, or personally talking to the CFO, and department heads.

The budget hearings are scheduled special meetings and board members should attend if possible.  These are public hearings for citizens to attend and address the board with any concerns they have about the budget/tax rate.  They are typically short meetings.  It’s been a very long time since anyone from the public has attended. 

Should salaried employees be paid overtime?

Federal and state laws primarily dictate when employees should be paid overtime.  Paying overtime to salaried employees is not the norm; however, there are certain situations, such as emergencies when employees are required to be at work for 24 hours in a row for days at a time.  We experienced this during the recent hurricane, Beryl.  During these type situations it is appropriate to compensate them for their time.  Our employees are our greatest resource. It would cost far more to train their replacement.

Ethics

The Board is not supposed to micro-manage, but should they trust and verify?

This was addressed in a previous question, “Is it the responsibility of the Board to monitor the spending of the District and verify expenses?”

Is there anything in your background of an embarrassing nature that should be explained before your election? Arrests/Convictions? Bankruptcies?

I have never been arrested.  I’ve never declared bankruptcy, nor have I been evicted or had a foreclosure. I have to pass an FBI background check every three years to maintain my industry license.   I’m glad you’re asking everyone this question.

Should District employees have open lines of communications with Board members, without fear of reprisal?  Why or why not?

Absolutely!  Several years ago, some of our board members voted to impose restrictions on board members speaking to employees.  I was very verbal in disagreeing, so much so, I told them I would not comply with the restriction (which I voted against).  Employees have contacted me over the years about legitimate concerns they have.  I am happy to bring their concerns to the attention of the executive team and the board so we can resolve any issues and make improvements to the District based on their input. Having said that, I don’t believe it’s appropriate for a board member to solicit information from employees, thus creating a negative environment.

Health care

Should any first responder injured in the line of duty have their ambulance charges absorbed by the District?

Yes.

Do you believe the Board should have access to all MCHD reports and records, excluding patient records?

No.  Many personnel records are required to be kept confidential.  We have access to everything we need to serve in our positions, which basically means all financial information and policy information. 

Is it better to build stand alone EMS facilities, co-locate with fire departments, or purchase existing facilities and modify them?

Each situation needs to be assessed individually.  We currently have stations in each of those categories with justifiable reasons for the decision.

Do you believe Board members should be allowed to ride along with EMS crews and spend time with Alarm and other departments? Explain your rationale.

Board members should be and are allowed to ride along with an EMS crew, tour alarm and other departments to see what our employees do.  However, MCHD has had to implement some rules because one or two of our former board members overstepped their authority, getting actively involved in the situation, interfering with the crew on a call, telling the police and the Emergency Department at hospitals they were the employees’ boss, which they were not. The Board should not micromanage the district employees, so these visits should be few and far between and limited in duration, and definitely limited in interaction with the employees.  Board members should only observe, not participate. 

Should the Medical Director be an employee or a contractor?

Based on Federal law, being an employee gives the District more control over duties, scheduling, and a host of other things, so being an employee is the best option in my opinion.

Other

Should Board members have open lines of communications with all employees of the District?

Absolutely!  Several years ago, some of our board members voted to impose restrictions on board members speaking to employees.  I was very verbal in disagreeing, so much so, I told them I would not comply with the restriction (which I voted against).  Employees have contacted me over the years about legitimate concerns they have.  I am happy to bring their concerns to the attention of the executive team and the board so we can resolve any issues and make improvements to the District based on their input. Having said that, I don’t believe it’s appropriate for a board member to solicit information from employees, thus creating a negative environment.

Should District employees living out of the county take home emergency vehicles?

They should be allowed to take home vehicles if they are on call after hours and need to be available to respond to emergencies.  

What is your opinion about Merit Pay versus COLA pay raises?

Both.