What is the job of the position you are running for?
1) To continue supporting and fully funding public safety
2) To continue promoting strong fiscal politics
3) To continue preserving the natural beauty of The Woodlands
No conflict of interest
What are the three main attributes that make you the most qualified for this position?
As a board certified dermatologist who taught at Baylor College of Medicine and managed my dermatology practice for 30 years, I understand the healthcare industry, academia, and the challenges of running a small business. I have seen the ravages over-regulation, over-taxation, and government that doesn't listen to the people.
My two terms on The Woodlnds Township Board, three terms on the Houston City Council, and service in the US House of Representatives, (R-TX-22), have given me the institutional knowledge and experience that is critical to serving on The Woodlands Township Board of Directors.
My record is clear. I am a proven conservative Christian leader, not afraid to stand up for God, family, America, and our community. I have delivered on my pledge to be a resident advocate. The relationships I have built at all levels of government: federal, state and local, help to find solutions to the problems facing our community.
What three major changes would you like to see implemented by the Township?
The Township Board, and indeed every level of government, must strive to be more transparent and more responsive to the people, while upholding the rule of law and honoring the Texas and U.S. Constitutions.
Do you think The Woodlands should become a city or remain unincorporated? Why or why not (what are some of the pro's and cons)? And if so, when should incorporation occur and why in that time frame?
In November 2021, The Woodlands' voters were given the opportunity to vote to become a city. They overwhelmingly voted against incorporation. I fully respect their decision and believe this issue is over and buried, at least for the foreseeable future, probably 30 years.
With new legislation (HB347) prohibiting annexation of smaller communities by larger/adjacent cities unless approved by voters, is The Woodlands still obligated to pay-off Houston ($1 million) and Conroe ($500,000) for that purpose?
The Regional Participation Agreements between The Woodlands and the Cities of Houston and Conroe were signed in 2007. These contracts released The Woodlands from potential annexation by Houston and Conroe until 2057 in exchange for a portion of the Township's sales tax, 1/16 of one penny of sales tax annually. The 2024 RPA payment is expected to total $2.4M. This contract is enforceable and not impacted by legislation signed into law after the fact.
It's been reported that The Woodlands comprises only 20% of households in the county, yet provides almost double that (35%) of the county total in property taxes. What would/could you do to correct this gross imbalance of tax inequity?
Many residents may not be aware that Woodlands taxpayers subsidize Montgomery County government. As Montgomery County's population increases and more property taxes are generated outside The Woodlands this anomaly may decrease.
Residents should be aware that in the 2024 Budget the Township Board increased the amount of money to be spent on community policing by $3.9M. The Woodlands will now pay $18.6M for enhanced law enforcement services. These funds will pay for salaries and vehicles for 106 law enforcement officers in Montgomery County (MCSO 100 positions and MCCO 6 positions) and 15 positions in the Harris County (HC Constable's Office). The opportunity to enhance law enforcement is defined in the Township's enabling legislation. Fully funding public safety is one of my priorities.
Did you support the recent construction initiative of a $300,000 bathroom in Capstone Park. Why or why not?
At the August 24, 2022, The Woodlands Township board meeting, the Parks and Recreation department presented several budget requests based on the 2022 Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment. Included in the long list were nine park restroom renovations and two new restroom facilities for Capstone Park and Sundance Park. These new restrooms would cost $840,000 each. Later, the P&R department reduced the price to $302,000 each. The restroom improvements were unanimously approved as part of the 2023 Township Budget.
In early December, the Township sent Affected Resident Letters to 384 residents of the Capstone neighborhood. The Township erected a sign in Capstone Park notifying visitors that construction would soon begin on a new restroom facility in the park.
During the Christmas Holidays, I received a call from Mrs. Ann Perry who lives across the street from the entrance of Capstone Park. Mrs. Perry wanted me to know that residents were against spending $302,00 in taxpayer money to build unwanted, unrequested restrooms in their park. She invited me to a resident meeting at the park pavilion the following Saturday morning.
That morning, December 31, the director of P&R, his assistant, and I listened to and learned from 29 homeowners about why new restrooms at this park, in particular, were a really bad idea. I told them I did not know any reason the board would object to their appeal. I promised to put the item back on the agenda, to work to have it rescinded, and redirect the funds to other park needs.
On February 16, after hours of public comments, overwhelmingly against building new restrooms, the Township board failed to listen to the residents and voted 6-1 in favor of continuing the project. I expressed my continued support for Capstone residents saying, “We asked for the residents’ opinion and they gave it to us. It behooves us to listen to them.” I was the only Nay vote.
Undeterred, I encouraged the residents to remain “persistent, professional and charitable”. They did. At every board meeting, scores of residents testified to their opposition to the new restrooms. Occasionally a resident would speak in support (including my opponent on the upcoming November 7 ballot). Over 657 people signed a petition on Change.org opposing new restrooms at Capstone Park.
Reasons given for opposing new restrooms included: waste of taxpayer money; leads to increase in crime, vandalism, traffic, and noise; increased risk to our children; will provide a haven for drug users and criminals; will attract homeless; will destroy old growth trees; will disrupt drainage and increase flooding; will negatively impact our home values; this park is over 30 years old, why install restrooms now?, etc.
Reasons given in support of restrooms included: people using the park need more restrooms, especially small children, runners, tennis and basketball players; peoples’ fears about public restrooms are speculative; 9 other area parks have restrooms, this one should as well; this park is for everyone not just the residents of Capstone, etc.
At the April 26, board meeting, after lengthy public comment, I requested to have the Capstone Park restroom issue placed back on the agenda. Here is a Ch 2 report https://www.click2houston.com/news/local/2023/04/27/some-residents-of-the-woodlands-frustrated-over-planned-restrooms-at-park/
On May 18, after more ardent public testimony, the Township board voted unanimously to reverse all earlier decisions and not build restrooms at Capstone Park. The $302,000 were redirected to other needs in the P&R department. Capstone Park will no longer be designated an “area park” and is now a “neighborhood park”.
I am honored to have worked closely with residents of Capstone and applaud their tenacity and professionalism in protecting their neighborhood park.
Are any of your family members employed by or working under contract to either The Woodlands Township or Montgomery County?
No