|
US Vote Smart
Candidate Path
|
Candidate Path
Submitted by john wertz on 2020-02-09 14:46:29
Pros
- 25+ yrs of LE experience(10 yrs as constable).
- Professional and people servant
- Number of community based interactive programs
- Claims to be frugal w/budget.
- Active office, claiming 4th highest arrest rate in county, behind MCSO, Conroe PD and DPS.
- Testified in Austin for Steve Toth's HB 1076 (Firearm protection).
- Well known in the community.
- Works more than 40 hours a week and spends a good amount of time on the road with his well-trained deputies
- Strongly opposes Red Flag Laws
- Endorsed by MCLEA.
Cons
- Ongoing investigation into allegations of wrong doing. 411 pages of testimonials against Hayden lend truth to the charges dismissed by T-COLE (Texas Commission on Law Enforcement), some say by those higher up in government
- Offical Oppression Case (Case Number: 18-01-0235) by Constable Hayden against (minority) Donald James Slaughter. Here is Mr. Slaughters sworn affadavit in the case.
- Constable Hayden's supporters accurately claim his primary opponent (Skero) has been a defendant in Federal Court on two separate occasions. What they didn't disclose is that this can be a common theme w/some citizens looking for a payday from the county/state, but nothing came of the two cases{Goldman vs. Skero (NO. 4:14-CV-00433) Motion to Dismiss and Mutual Rlease, as well as the Pinder Case).
- Supporters of Haydens also claim that Skero was arrested as a juvenile. The case was dimissed. (More details on Mr. Skero's page).
- Constable Hayden claims to be a member of Mo. County Tea Party (one must be a dues-paying member and there's no record of Mr. Hayden's membership. Nor has he given to the Republican Party since at least 6/26/18(the new bienium, for which I've been the elected Treasurer).
- Overstaffed to accomplish their constitutional duties. Has too many supervisors.
- Over the years has grown a massive bureaucracy. We elected a countywide Sheriff to do policing.
- The constable office needs to focus on servicing the needs of the courts.
- To accomplish the constitutional duties only needs a staff of 6 to 7 instead of the 39 employees he has now.
- Every year in the last 3 years has added staff. This is one reason why our county taxes are double other peer counties.
- Need to transfer these excessive employees to Sheriff and allow him consolidate these redundant functions and gain efficiencies.